Philip Grant Writes:
On Saturday 10 November I received a duplicated letter from
Andy Bates, Brent's Planning Officer dealing with the Willesden Green Library
Centre applications, giving details of them and how to comment on
them. Mine was one of about 2,750 such letters, sent to "consultees
and neighbours". It includes the statement:
'If you wish to comment on these applications against reference 12/2924, your views will be taken into account on BOTH applications provided they are received online or via post, within 21 days of the date of this letter.'
As the date of the letter
is shown as 7 November 2012, this effectively says that I have to
submit any objections or other comments by Wednesday 28 November 2012
at the latest if they are to be taken into account in deciding both
the planning (ref. 12/2924) and conservation area consent (ref. 12/2925)
applications. This is no doubt why the Full Details page for application
12/2924 on the Brent Planning website says: 'This case will be decided no
earlier than 28/11/2012'.
Although I have already
posted the first online "comment" on this application, I cannot really
consider what my objections or other comments might be until I can see the
plans and read the, no doubt voluminous, documents which make up the
application. Both the letter and website say that these 'should be
available to view by 13 November 2012'. Two weeks to read and digest all of
this information, then submit detailed and well-argued views on the
application is a tall order, but this is what anyone who wishes to put
in an objection to the planning application within the Statutory Consultation
Period will have to do.
Brent has its own
statutory responsibilities in respect of Galliford Try's planning application.
Because of the number of housing units involved, it counts as a "major
development", but as long as it is a valid application, Brent has to determine
it within 13 weeks of the date the application was received. This would be by
1 February 2013, but in practice the decision would have to be taken at the
Planning Committee meeting scheduled for Wednesday 16 January. What with such
a complex planning report to write, and the Christmas / New Year holiday
period, it is no wonder that Andy Bates wants any comments by 28
November.
Despite the impression
given in the letter, there is a different situation for comments on or
objections to the Conservation Area Consent application (ref. 12/2925). Public
Notice has not yet been published about this application, and the time limit
for objections etc. will be 21 days after the later of the posting of notices
near Willesden Green Library or advertising details of the
application in a local newspaper.
The
Consent application for partial demolition of the 1894 library building
will not be decided by Brent's Planning Committee, but will be referred to the
Secretary of State for a decision in the event of the Council being minded to
grant planning permission for the redevelopment of the existing Library Centre
site. This has been confirmed to me by Chris Walker, Brent's
Assistant
Director (Planning & Development), in an email of 9 November (copied to
Andy Bates):
'As the revised application still involves a partial demolition of the library building within the conservation area it would remain my view that the application should be referred to the Secretary of State.'
Any comments made on the consent application have to be passed on to
the Secretary of State (in practice, to the Communities and Local
Government Department's National Planning Casework Unit). If Andy Bates is
advising people to make a comment covering both applications, this
suggests that the full text of all comments or objections on the applications
will be forwarded to the Secretary of State, as well as being taken into
consideration on the planning application. I will check this point with
him.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.